Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/ThiemannmapHard.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

Q is empty.

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [15] we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

ap(ap(map, x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, false), x0), x1)
ap(isEmpty, nil)
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x0), x1))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))
ap(dropLast, nil)
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f)
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(last, xs)
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(f, ap(last, xs))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(if, ap(isEmpty, xs))
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(isEmpty, xs)
AP(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(map, f)
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs)))
AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(dropLast, xs)
AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

ap(ap(map, x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, false), x0), x1)
ap(isEmpty, nil)
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x0), x1))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))
ap(dropLast, nil)
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f)
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(last, xs)
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(f, ap(last, xs))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(if, ap(isEmpty, xs))
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(isEmpty, xs)
AP(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(map, f)
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs)))
AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(dropLast, xs)
AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

ap(ap(map, x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, false), x0), x1)
ap(isEmpty, nil)
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x0), x1))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))
ap(dropLast, nil)
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted some edges using various graph approximations

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(last, xs)
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f)
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(f, ap(last, xs))
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(if, ap(isEmpty, xs))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(isEmpty, xs)
AP(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(map, f)
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs)))
AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(dropLast, xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

ap(ap(map, x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, false), x0), x1)
ap(isEmpty, nil)
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x0), x1))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))
ap(dropLast, nil)
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 3 SCCs with 9 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

ap(ap(map, x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, false), x0), x1)
ap(isEmpty, nil)
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x0), x1))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))
ap(dropLast, nil)
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13]. Here, we combined the reduction pair processor with the A-transformation [14] which results in the following intermediate Q-DP Problem.
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DROPLAST(cons(x, cons(y, ys))) → DROPLAST(cons(y, ys))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

map(x0, x1)
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
isEmpty(nil)
isEmpty(cons(x0, x1))
last(cons(x0, nil))
last(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
dropLast(nil)
dropLast(cons(x0, nil))
dropLast(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
DROPLAST(x1) = DROPLAST(x1)
cons(x1, x2) = cons(x2)

Recursive Path Order [2].
Precedence:

cons₁ > DROPLAST₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

ap(ap(map, x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, false), x0), x1)
ap(isEmpty, nil)
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x0), x1))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))
ap(dropLast, nil)
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AP(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

ap(ap(map, x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, false), x0), x1)
ap(isEmpty, nil)
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x0), x1))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))
ap(dropLast, nil)
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))

LAST(cons(x, cons(y, ys))) → LAST(cons(y, ys))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

map(x0, x1)
if(true, x0, x1)
if(false, x0, x1)
isEmpty(nil)
isEmpty(cons(x0, x1))
last(cons(x0, nil))
last(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
dropLast(nil)
dropLast(cons(x0, nil))
dropLast(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

AP(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → AP(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
LAST(x1) = LAST(x1)
cons(x1, x2) = cons(x2)

Recursive Path Order [2].
Precedence:

cons₁ > LAST₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

ap(ap(map, x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, false), x0), x1)
ap(isEmpty, nil)
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x0), x1))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))
ap(dropLast, nil)
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(f, ap(last, xs))
AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

ap(ap(map, x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, false), x0), x1)
ap(isEmpty, nil)
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x0), x1))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))
ap(dropLast, nil)
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(f, ap(last, xs))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
AP(x1, x2) = AP(x1)
ap(x1, x2) = ap(x2)
if = if
false = false
last = last
map = map
dropLast = dropLast
isEmpty = isEmpty
nil = nil
true = true
cons = cons

Recursive Path Order [2].
Precedence:

dropLast > cons > ap₁ > if > AP₁
dropLast > cons > ap₁ > map > AP₁
isEmpty > false > last > ap₁ > if > AP₁
isEmpty > false > last > ap₁ > map > AP₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AP(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → AP(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs))
AP(ap(map, f), xs) → AP(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ap(ap(map, f), xs) → ap(ap(ap(if, ap(isEmpty, xs)), f), xs)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), f), xs) → nil
ap(ap(ap(if, false), f), xs) → ap(ap(cons, ap(f, ap(last, xs))), ap(ap(map, f), ap(dropLast, xs)))
ap(isEmpty, nil) → true
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x), xs)) → false
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → x
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(last, ap(ap(cons, y), ys))
ap(dropLast, nil) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), nil)) → nil
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x), ap(ap(cons, y), ys))) → ap(ap(cons, x), ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, y), ys)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

ap(ap(map, x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, true), x0), x1)
ap(ap(ap(if, false), x0), x1)
ap(isEmpty, nil)
ap(isEmpty, ap(ap(cons, x0), x1))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(last, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))
ap(dropLast, nil)
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), nil))
ap(dropLast, ap(ap(cons, x0), ap(ap(cons, x1), x2)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.